Legal Opinion

St. Peter Herald v. City of St. Peter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1993No. C9-91-1675PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

Does the Minnesota Data Practices Act require compliance with a request to make public a letter which puts a city on notice of claimed damages? The trial court ruled that the Data Practices Act does not require the city to produce the notice of claim, and a divided panel of the court of appeals affirmed. We reverse, albeit reluctantly, and hold that the city is required to produce the notice of claim.

The facts are undisputed: On June 24, 1991 the St. Peter City Council met in closed meeting. 1 The closure of the meeting prompted reporters for the St. Peter Herald and The Free…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Peter Herald v. City of St. PeterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Westrom v. Minnesota Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Star Tribune v. Minnesota Twins PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. HTR Restaurants v. Erie Insurance, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. HTR Restaurants, Aplt. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Op. Atty. Gen. 852 (Cr. Ref. 523a-17, 523a-27), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API