Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cornelius v. Benefield

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 3, 2013No. 2012-CA-00021-COAPublished

1Concurrence

MAXWELL, J.,

specially concurring:

¶ 28. While I am not swayed by all parts of the majority’s analysis, after reviewing our supreme court’s decisions in Holder v. Orange Grove Medical Specialties, P.A.,4 and Hanson v. Disotell,5 I do agree that the judgment of dismissal must be affirmed. But much like Justice Pierce, who wrote separately in Holder, I too “have some discomfort with the decision of the trial court,” particularly since the cited delays here are relatively slight and Cornelius’s new counsel was working to move the case forward when it was dismissed. Holder, 54 So.3d at 201 (¶ 38)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Days InnMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cox v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Holder v. Orange Grove Medical Specialties, P.A.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hanson v. DisotellMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Jackson Public School District v. Head Ex Rel. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API