Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re S.H.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2002No. S-9633PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

SH. was adjudged to be in need of a special conservator in 1997 regarding litigation he was pursuing against Anchorage Refuse,; Inc. After we affirmed the appointment of a conservator in 1999, S.H.'s conservator moved to finalize a settlement entered into in 1997. At that time, S.H. petitioned the superior court to terminate the conservatorship, claiming that he was competent to manage his affairs. The superior court denied the petition to terminate, entered the settlement, and dismissed S.H.'s litigation against Anchorage Refuse. S.H. appeals the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gaudiane v. LundgrenAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re Conservatorship of NelsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re SHAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API