Deen v. Egleston
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief Judge.
Presently before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
At this stage in the case, the Court views the facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the nonmovant. See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). Viewed in such a light, the facts are as follows. On July 18, 2005, Kenneth Deen (“Mr. Deen”) visited the offices of Tami M. Kidney, D.D.S. (“Dr. Kidney”) d/b/a “Gentle Dental” in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Darlene M. Kesinger v. Thomas HerringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Deen v. EglestonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.