City of Lilburn v. Sanchez
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Justice.
This appeal is brought by the City of Lilburn (“the City”) from the trial court’s order declaring unconstitutional the City’s municipal ordinance requiring land lots at least one acre in size for the keeping of a Vietnamese pot-bellied pig as a domestic pet. Upon review, we are satisfied that a rational relationship exists between the ordinance and the legitimate governmental goal of reducing the substantial negative impacts these animals might have upon residential communities. We also are convinced that in ruling otherwise, the trial court improperly usurped the authority of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Gradous v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atlanta Taxicab Co. Owners Ass'n v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- State v. Old South Amusements, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Georgia Department of Human Resources v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Old South Duck Tours, Inc. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Fairfax MK, Inc. v. City of ClarkstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.