Georgia Department of Human Resources v. Sweat
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Presiding Justice.
The trial court declared Georgia’s statutory child support guidelines to be unconstitutional, concluding they violate the constitutional guarantees of due process, equal protection and privacy, and also operate as an unconstitutional taking of property. Having reviewed the matter, we conclude that the trial court erred by employing incorrect constitutional standards and unsound constitutional analyses. Therefore, we reverse.
When they divorced in November 1998, Samuel and Michelle Sweat agreed that Samuel would retain custody of the couple’s three minor children, that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ambles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In the Interest of A. C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Favorito v. HandelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Ward v. McFallSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Daniel v. Amicalola Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.