Legal Opinion

Shelbyville v. Kendrick

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This is an action brought by Kendrick as an employe of Shelbyville, under the Workmen's Compensation Act, for an injury to his eye, which resulted in the physical removal of the eyeball by a surgeon. Compensation was awarded in the full amount as for the loss of an eye, fifty per centum of the average weekly wages of the employe for one hundred weeks. Acts 1919, chapter 123, section 28, subsection c.

In support of its appeal the City of Shelbyville insists that Kendrick is not entitled to the compensation fixed by the statute for the loss of an eye, for the reason that an old injury to .the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Purchase v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Knoxville Knitting Mills Co. v. GalyonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Claim of Hobertis v. Columbia Shirt Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. ThrashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Catlett v. Chattanooga Handle Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Phillips v. Diamond Coal Mining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Tomes v. GrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API