Legal Opinion
Dix Chesley Herbert Jr. v. Jeremiah Lupe, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 8, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02644Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIX CHESLEY HERBERT JR., Case No. 2:25-cv-2644-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEREMIAH LUPE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff brings this action against Turlock Police Officer Jeremiah Lupe and Deputy 19 Public Defender Michael Scheid. After review of the complaint, I find that, for screening 20 purposes, plaintiff has stated a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment claim against Lupe.1 The 21 complaint fails, however, to state a cognizable claim against Scheid. Plaintiff shall indicate 22…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.