Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murk v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 7, 1989No. 05-88-01100-CRPublished

1DissentKinkeade, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

Article 1.14(b) provides:

If the defendant does not object to a defect, error, or irregularity of form or substance in an indictment or information before the date on which the trial on the merits commences, he waives and forfeits the right to object to the defect, error, or irregularity and he may not raise the objection on appeal or in any other postconviction proceeding. Nothing in this article prohibits a trial court from requiring that an objection to an indictment or information be made at an earlier time in compliance with Article 28.01 of this code.

TEX.CODE…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Victory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Ex Parte ElliottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Studer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Cardenas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API