Legal Opinion

Cardenas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1982No. 141-81PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

ODOM, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for prostitution, and punishment was assessed at 3 days in jail and a $250.00 fine. The Court of Appeals for the 14th Supreme Judicial District, relying on Art. 21.05, V.A.C.C.P., and Victory v. State, 547 S.W.2d 1, reversed and held the information was defective. Cardenas v. State, 628 S.W.2d 153. We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to consider its sole ground for review, which may be divided into two parts:(1) The information is not fundamentally defective for failing to allege a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Victory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Cardenas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mattias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Frieling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  3. Murk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Lozano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API