J. Leslie Asher, Jr., and William R. Elmenhorst v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge:
These are appeals, in forma pauperis, from convictions of the appellants, after a jury trial, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The crime for which each appellant was convicted was the violation of § 2118(a) of Title 18, United States Code, which section defines, inter alia, robbery of a bank by intimidation, and § 2 of Title 18, United States Code, aiding and abetting one Paré in the robbery of a bank.
Evidence was received at the trial of the appellants which supports the following narrative of pertinent events. At about 4:30 in the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. J. Norman JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. George Allen WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. James Donald SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Joshua Dailey RouseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. William George LevisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.