Lackner v. Roth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In three related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) Joseph Lackner and Joan Lackner, the plaintiffs in action No. 1 and action No. 2, appeal, as limited by their brief, (a) from so much of an order *687of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), entered May 4, 1989, as granted the cross motion of George and Susan Roth, the defendants third-party plaintiffs in action No. 1, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (b) from so much of an order of the same court, also entered May 4, 1989, as granted the cross motion of George and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meyer v. WhisnantNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Rowlands v. ParksNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Palmer v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Palmer v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Breckir v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rivas v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Candela v. Port Motors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Wright v. MorozinisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Giuffrida v. Panasonic Industrial Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Stoebe v. NortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.