Legal Opinion

Eady v. Stewart Dredging & Const. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 25, 1985No. 83-1255PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, Stewart Dredging and Construction Company, Inc., brought suit to recover sums due for work and labor done and materials furnished. The case was tried without a jury on April 5, 1984. The defendant, Richard Eady, d/b/a Eady Sand and Gravel, before resting his case, sought a continuance in order to locate a witness, Larry Parker. The defendant contends that the court granted a continuance for the reason defendant advanced. The trial court granted a continuance, but made it clear that the reason for granting the continuance was not so the defense could locate Mr. Parker:

"THE COURT:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Madison v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stover v. Alabama Farm Bureau Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Kitchens v. MayeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Adams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. King v. National Foundation Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API