Legal Opinion

Reese v. Roth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 14, 1978No. 76-447PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward

This suit, brought under the Dramshop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 43, par. 135), resulted from the collision of two automobiles, a Karmann Ghia driven by Roland Porter and a Pinto driven by Edward Bedal. Both Porter and Bedal died as a result of the collision, and Brent Beebe, a passenger in Bedal’s Pinto, was seriously injured. A consolidated action seeking recovery for loss of support was brought by Norma Porter Reese on her own behalf, on behalf of the estate of her son, Roland Porter, and on behalf of the next of kin of Roland Porter; Kenneth Bedal, on his own behalf, on behalf of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Champion v. KnasiakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Hernandez v. DiazIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. St. Clair v. DouvasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  4. Cope v. GepfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reed v. FlemingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Bachman v. Sharon & Lo's Place, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Rose v. Brozman's Tavern, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Lang v. B. I. T., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Krawczyk v. PolinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API