Bachman v. Sharon & Lo's Place, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
The plaintiffs, Kim Bachman et al., brought suit against the defendants pursuant to the Dramshop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 43, par. 135). The defendants-appellants, Sharon & Lo’s Place et al. (hereinafter the defendants) bring this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss two counts of the plaintiffs’ complaint.
The plaintiffs are the spouse and children of Howard Bachman. After he was killed in a motorcycle accident on July 7, 1985, the plaintiffs sued the defendants under the Dramshop Act. Count II of the complaint alleged that the defendants were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Hernandez v. DiazIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Jackson v. NavikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Shepherd v. MarsagliaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Overocker v. RetoffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schramer v. Tiger Athletic Ass'n of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Widmer v. HooverAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Jackson-Baker v. ImmesoeteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Bachman v. Sharon & Lo's Place, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Schramer v. Tiger Athletic Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.