Legal Opinion
Ismil v. LH Sowles Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1972No. 43302PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
This is an action to recover damages sustained by plaintiffs 1 as a result of an industrial accident on February 25, 1970, in the construction of a Control Data Corporation building in Bloomington, Minnesota. Pursuant to the jury’s special verdict, judgment was entered for plaintiffs against defendants L. H. Sowles Company and William Grove. Defendant Sowles Company appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial and from the judgment. We affirm.
The accident occurred while concrete was being poured for the fourth-floor walls of a concrete wind tower.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Olson v. PrayfrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
3Cited by9 opinions
- Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Schneider v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Rademaker v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Teska v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.