Legal Opinion
Washington Trust Co. v. Smith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 30, 1996No. 13416PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
This is the appeal of the proposed defendants Spicer Plus, Inc. (Spicer), and John Holstein, trustee of City Discount Oil Nominee Trust (Holstein), from the judgment rendered by the trial court denying their motions to be made parties as of right1 to the underlying foreclosure action, and confirming the foreclosure by sale. The appellees are the plaintiff, Washington Trust *332Company (Washington Trust), which is the holder of the mortgage being foreclosed, and the intervening defendant Hendel’s Investors Company (Hendel’s), the highest bidder at the foreclosure sale.
In February, 1990, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marino v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Unisys Corp. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- United States v. 36.96 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Washington Trust Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Grimes v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In re Ryan V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Washington Trust Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.