Legal Opinion
Dill v. Scuka
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 18, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 20539PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
In this personal injury action instituted in this court on April 11, 1956, and now awaiting a second trial (see Dill v. Scuka, 3 Cir., 1960, 279 F.2d 145),1 both counsel concede that the presence of both parties in Kansas, where the alleged tort occurred, the partially paralyzed condition of the plaintiff making travel most difficult for him, the less congested status of the docket in the U. S. District Court for the District of Kansas, and the unavailability of the judge who conducted the first trial in this District, among other factors, qualify this case for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- All States Freight, Inc. v. ModarelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Johnson v. NickersonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1962