Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Lowell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 8, 1894No. 173PublishedCited by 36 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUXT COURT., OF THE UNITED STATES ¿OR THE ' DISTRICT 0¿ MINNESOTA. , This was an action at law for personal injuries received by the plaintiff Lowell while crossing the track of the defendant at Ridgeway station,.within the limits of the city of St. Paid.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUXT COURT., OF THE UNITED STATES ¿OR THE ' DISTRICT 0¿ MINNESOTA. , This was an action at law for personal injuries received by the plaintiff Lowell while crossing the track of the defendant at Ridgeway station,.within the limits of the city of St. Paid. It appeals-by tlie bill of exceptions that the folio wing facts were established by the evidence: ■ The defendant, on the 17th day of March, 18S9, was a common carrier of passengers for hire, and was on that day operating a railroad between St-. Paul and Minneapolis. One of the stations on the-road was Ridgewood- Park, within…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

Practically the only question in this case is whether the evidence so clearly showed the plaintiff to have been guilty of contributory negligence as to entitle the defendant, as matter of law, to an instruction to the jury to return a verdict in its favor.-

It was not seriously contended that the defendant was free from fault in failing to stop its train, in' compliance with its own rule, which demanded’that “ when a train is standing on a double track for passengers, trains from the opposite direction will come to a full stop, with the engines opposite to each other, and proceed slowly until…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Stevens v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Warner v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. Coley v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API