Airline Pilots Ass'n International v. United Airlines, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
California’s Kin Care Law (Lab. Code, § 233) requires employers who provide paid sick leave to their employees to allow employees to use sick leave to care for family members. United Airlines, Inc. (United), seeks to avoid this state law obligation by the creation of an employee sick leave plan and trust, which United holds out as being subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.) and, thus, exempt from state regulation.
In ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court determined, among other…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- United Farmers Agents Ass'n, Inc. v. Farmers Grp., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Silva v. Medic Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.