Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1910No. 8771PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered December 29, 1909, granting plaintiff a new trial, after granting a nonsuit, in an action of ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This .is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The action was brought by the respondents to eject the appellant from the occupation' of lots 3 and 5, block 9, Aberdeen tide lands, and for damages. The case was tried to a jury. At the close of plaintiffs’ testimony, the court granted a nonsuit, upon the ground that the plaintiffs had failed to show that the defendant was occupying any part of the lots. Upon a motion for a new trial, the court concluded that there was some evidence that defendant was occupying a portion of the lots, and therefore granted the motion for a new trial. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Johnson v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Woodworth v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kiefer v. LaraWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SaulsberryWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API