Legal Opinion

Kent v. Bell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1962No. Docket 29, Calendar 49,625Published

1Opinion of the Court

368 Mich. 443 (1962)

118 N.W.2d 486

KENT

v.

BELL.

Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 49,625.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 4, 1962.

Milton F. Cooney, for plaintiff.

Patterson & Patterson and Barrett (Goodloe H. Rogers, of counsel), for defendant Barrett, executor.

CARR, C.J. (dissenting).

Plaintiff in this case brought suit in the circuit court of Oakland county seeking the specific enforcement of an alleged verbal contract claimed to have been made by him with Aileen Kent, his former wife. The bill of complaint alleged that for many years prior to November 24, 1950, plaintiff and Mrs. Kent were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AikensIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Culy v. UphamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Applebaum v. WechslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Plassey v. S. Loewenstein & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Lamb v. JeffreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API