Legal Opinion

Pope v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1945No. 4 Div. 885Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on an indictment, omitting formal parts, charging: “ * * * did in the nighttime, with intent to steal, break into and enter a building of John Berry and Ruth Berry, towit, a cafe, shop, store, storehouse, or warehouse, which said building was specially constructed or made to keep goods, wares or merchandise, and in which goods, wares or merchandise was kept for use, sale or deposit, against * *

Demurrer to the indictment presents the position that the failure to allege that the goods, wares or merchandise -are of any value makes the indictment insufficient.

In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Cheatwood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API