Pope v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
Appellant was convicted on an indictment, omitting formal parts, charging: “ * * * did in the nighttime, with intent to steal, break into and enter a building of John Berry and Ruth Berry, towit, a cafe, shop, store, storehouse, or warehouse, which said building was specially constructed or made to keep goods, wares or merchandise, and in which goods, wares or merchandise was kept for use, sale or deposit, against * *
Demurrer to the indictment presents the position that the failure to allege that the goods, wares or merchandise -are of any value makes the indictment insufficient.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Cheatwood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.