Legal Opinion

Heikkila v. Carver

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1987No. 15726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment concerning the rights and obligations of the parties under an arbitration provision in a contract for deed. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Howard and Reino Heikkila (Heikkilas) owned a 5,920 acre ranch in Harding County, South Dakota. In 1971, they entered into an oil and gas lease with Inland Oil & Gas Corporation that covered 1,840 acres on the ranch. The granting clause provided that the lessor:

“... grants, leases, and lets exclusively to Lessee the land described below for the purpose of investigating, exploring

for,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Sanford v. Arjay Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. TDC Engineering, Inc. v. Dunlap, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carver v. HeikkilaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Del Rio Drilling Programs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. In re DoeringSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API