Legal Opinion

In re Doering

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 26, 1996No. 94-362PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henry and Carolyn *604Doering appeal from a judgment of the Windsor Superior Court, arguing that the court erred in concluding that William Tabor, Jane Tabor Taylor and Marie Tabor Wortman, heirs to the estate of Rolla Bugbee, own a fee simple interest in metals and minerals underlying property owned by the Doerings. We affirm.

The Doerings first became aware that subsurface mineral rights had been severed when they purchased their property in 1964. Their deed stated that the “premises are subject to the exception and reservation of mineral and metal rights and right of way as described in a deed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Dearing v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Schaneman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. In Re Estates of AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Chase v. Taft Hill Tree Farm, Inc.Vermont Superior Court · 2014
  4. Denio v. State of VermontVermont Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API