Legal Opinion

Musgrove v. Department of Health & Social Services

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1972No. 844PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Appellant appeals the termination of welfare assistance pursuant to Aid to the Aged, Blind and Disabled (AABD), asserting (1) Appellee failed to follow its own regulation, and (2) Appellee’s regulation denying credit for rent paid to a relative makes an unlawful classification between landlords who are relatives and those who are not.

We affirm.

Appellant had been receiving AABD assistance in the amount of $10 per month. She moved from the house she was renting for $25 per month into a room at her sister’s home. Her assistance was terminatd because the “common requirement”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Board of Education v. State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance v. KurthNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Dick v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. American Bank of Commerce v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Padilla v. Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Benally v. HeimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API