Legal Opinion

Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance v. Kurth

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1980No. 4112PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDREWS, Judge.

In this action we are asked to consider whether a claimant under the Workmen’s Compensation Act [§§ 52-1-1 to 52-1-69, N.M.S.A. 1978], may assign all of his rights of action to a third party, in this case the workmen’s compensation insurer.

On January 25, 1978, plaintiffs Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance Company and Joseph F. Higgins filed suit against defendant, Victoria Kurth, alleging damages arising out of an automobile accident which occurred January 28, 1975. Paragraph 3 of the original complaint alleged specific acts of negligence on the part of the defendant and,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reed v. StyronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Springer Corporation v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  5. McCasland v. PratherNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chavez-Rey v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Bralley v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Gutierrez v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Quality Chiropractic, PC v. Farmers InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. St. Joseph Healthcare System v. Travelers CompaniesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API