Legal Opinion

United States v. Remo

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 5, 1991No. CRIM. No. 1:91-CR-2(12)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COBB, District Judge.

The defendant, Frank Remo, A/K/A “Big Daddy” (Remo), has filed a motion to vacate the detention order entered June 10, 1991 by United States Magistrate Judge George A. Kelt, Jr.. For the reasons set forth below, Remo’s motion is denied.

I. THE INDICTMENT

Remo is named in two counts of a thirteen defendant, twenty-one count indictment now pending in this court. Many of Remo’s co-defendants have plead guilty and agreed to testify for the government. Some of Remo’s co-defendants have already been sentenced, one to a term of 120 months in the custody…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Albert Samuel Fortna, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. William Bruce HareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Stephen QuartermaineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Tommy Ward BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API