Legal Opinion

People v. Mundt

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1939No. Crim. 1667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ TUTTLE,

The defendant in this case was tried before a jury and convicted of the crime of robbery in the first degree. He now appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying motion for a new trial.

The main witness for the prosecution was John Hill. Mr. Hill had been at a dance-hall in Sacramento, and at about 2:00 o’clock A. M. on January 8, 1936, had left the dance-hall to get into his automobile which was parked on Fifth Street, just south of the corner of Fifth and J Streets. He had in his possession approximately $450 which he had drawn from the bank, with which to purchase…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. LionbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. CorbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. BarberaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Anglin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  4. People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. BratisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API