Legal Opinion

In re Haywood Wagon Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 15, 1914No. 76PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. The Haywood Wagon Company was a stock corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York. It was established in the village of Baldwinsville, Onondaga county, N. Y. It had an authorized capital stock of $130,000, and its business was the manufacture of dump wagons embodying certain patented features of acknowledged merit.

Read the full summary

Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. The Haywood Wagon Company was a stock corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York. It was established in the village of Baldwinsville, Onondaga county, N. Y. It had an authorized capital stock of $130,000, and its business was the manufacture of dump wagons embodying certain patented features of acknowledged merit. In 1910 it removed its factory to Newark, Wayne county, N. Y. It owned a parcel of land at Newark comprising about 16 acres,, the plant…

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We are asked to set aside and annul an order entered in the court below confirming a sale of the bankrupt’s property. The court had the subject of the confirmation of this sale before it twice and seems to have given the matter careful consideration. In his final decision of the question the District Judge declared he had “become satisfied that a resale of the property of the bankrupt company which is the subject of. this controversy, or of any separate parcel thereof, free from mortgages, accrued interest, and taxes, would not be of substantial benefit to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Skilton v. . CodingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Williams v. AllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Files v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Godchaux v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Van Huffel v. HarkelrodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. In Re Anjopa Paper & Board Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. In re Franklin Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Rossi v. Colorado Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API