Legal Opinion

United States v. House

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 29, 1983No. CM 443417PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION

FOREMAN, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of three specifications of larceny and three specifications of housebreaking, in violation of Articles 121 and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 930 (1976). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. This case involves issues arising from inartful language in the pretrial agreement as well as the convening authority’s action.

On 22…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. KellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. LoftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. NastroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. BraxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. HancockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GoodenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API