Legal Opinion

United States v. Blankenship

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided December 4, 1995No. Nos. 95-3138, 89-30073PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*462 OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Methamphetamine — revisited.

And a mandatory minimum sentence.

This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence.

This is the Court’s preliminary consideration of this matter pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the United States District Courts Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which provides: “If it plainly appears from the face of the motion and any annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings in the case that the movant is not entitled to relief in district court, the judge shall…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Phillip D. Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Bonard Ray DeninnoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WatkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API