Legal Opinion
Arthur C. Laughner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1967No. 23854_1PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Chief Judge:
The district court has twice denied the motion made by appellant pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his conviction for knowingly transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce. The first denial was made without benefit of a hearing on the motion. On appeal therefrom this court concluded that the allegations respecting the inadequacy of the representation afforded appellant by his court-appointed counsel made necessary a factual judicial inquiry, and remanded the case for that purpose. Laughner v. United States, 360 F.2d 159 (5 Cir. 1966).
On remand, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- James J. Domenica v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Farnsworth v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- John Vincent Rimanich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. WigginsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
- United States v. MontiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- United States v. PinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Joseph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.