Gasser v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
In this workmen’s compensation case the only question involved is one of law as to whether it comqg within the terms of the federal Employers’ Liability Act or is controlled by the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.
There is no dispute as to the facts, which we will briefly state. William Gasser had been in the employ of defendant for a number of years and at the time of an accident which caused his death was engaged as station agent for the company at Walnutport, Pennsylvania. The company was regularly engaged at the place of employment in both interstate and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. YurkonisSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scarborough v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Camili v. Penna. R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Mason v. Reading CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Brown v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. ConteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.