Mitchell v. Lay
Supreme Court of Louisiana
EEHEARING as-to the sureties on the injunction bond. See first part of. this case, 3 An. 593.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
Slidell, J.
The order of appeal was granted upon motion, and in general terms. It must be considered as embracing not only the plaintiff in the cause, but also the sureties in the injunction bond, who, by a fiction of law (Statute of 1831,) are parties plaintiffs in the injunction. The appeal being ordered upon motion, the sureties are to be considered as having been cited as appellees. Act *515of 1843, p. 40. Isabella v. Picot, 2 An. 390. If the appeal bond was informal in naming their principal only as obligee, upon which point we express no opinion, it…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Sammons v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Esparros v. VicknairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- In re LindnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Bannister v. Chisesi LongoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Succession of UthoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.