Legal Opinion
Bruno v. Department of Consumer Protection
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1983No. 11019PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff has appealed from the dismissal of his application to vacate or to vacate in part and correct an arbitration award. The facts have been stipulated. The plaintiff was employed as an inspector by the state department of consumer protection. On or about January 12, 1979, the plaintiff was arrested and charged with larceny and possession of weapons in a motor vehicle. As a result of these charges, the plaintiff was immediately notified that he had been placed on leave of absence. This leave was extended by letters from the department in February, March and September of 1979. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Carroll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Board of Education v. Bridgeport Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- City of Waterbury v. Waterbury Police UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- City of New Britain v. Connecticut State Board of Mediation & ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- City of New Haven v. AFSCME, Council 15, Local 530Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.