Legal Opinion

People v. Daniels

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 1998No. 1—96—2831, 1—89—3429 consPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

This is one of the first, if not the first, criminal cases in Illinois where a trial judge allowed the State to present DNA evidence against the accused. One of the defendant’s contentions is that his attorney was ill-equipped to challenge the evidence. We examine that contention, as well as the State’s claim that the DNA evidence did defendant no harm.

In this consolidated appeal Michael Daniels (Daniels) seeks review of his 1989 convictions for murder and aggravated criminal sexual assault, his sentence of natural life imprisonment, and the 1996 order denying his petition for postconviction…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. People v. TyeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. People v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. People v. FountainAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API