Legal Opinion

People v. Dunn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 22, 1999No. 1-98-0284PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE GORDON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant Maurice Dunn filed a pro se postconviction petition, counsel was appointed and the trial court then dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, defendant primarily contends that he is entitled to DNA testing.

Defendant’s first trial for rape and aggravated battery (great bodily harm) resulted in a mistrial. Defendant was subsequently retried by a jury and was convicted of rape, aggravated battery (great bodily harm) and aggravated battery while on a public way. He was sentenced to an extended prison term…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. MolstadIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. OlingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. OwensIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. SavoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. People v. ShumIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. RokitaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Zollman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API