People v. Killebrew
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Introduction
We granted leave to appeal in these two cases to address the issue of "whether sentencing disposition is an appropriate subject for plea agreement; and, if so, what is the proper role of the court with respect to a sentence agreement”. 408 Mich 958, 959 (1980). We recognize that "charge bargaining” is a traditionally accepted practice in Michigan. We now proceed to determine whether or not sentence bargaining will likewise be accepted and, if accepted, under what terms.
We hold that sentencing concerns are appropriate subjects for plea bargaining. However, we hold that the judge’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- People v. CobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- People v. GroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SchaefferConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- People v. ConnorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.