Hadley v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
This case presents the issue as to whether, in making its decision to compromise its lien for reimbursement, the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) erred as a matter of law in considering the fact the injured worker had already settled his third party claim. We hold that RCW 51.24.060(3) provides discretion to the Department in making such a decision. As long as the Department considers the factors set forth in the statute, it is not error for the Department to consider the fact the parties have already settled.
*900I
Respondent Hadley was an ironworker, employed by Leckenby Steel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Allison v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Maxey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shum v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Tallerday v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. DalmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Burnett v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Hadley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.