Legal Opinion
State v. Harper, Clerk of District Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 1911No. 2124PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Action by the State, on the relation of Edward E. Reardon, County Attorney, for writ of mandamus to Hathaway Harper, Clerk of the District Court. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
This proceeding in error is to review the judgment of the trial court entered in an agreed case (section 6051, Comp. Laws 1909).
The stipulated facts are as follows:
"First. Said E. E. Reardon is the duly elected, qualified and acting county attorney of said Oklahoma county, and said Hathaway Harper is now, and has been at all times since November, 1907, the duly elected, qualified, and acting clerk of the district court of said Oklahoma county.
"Second. Said Hathaway Harper, as such district clerk, has not filed with the board of county commissioners the verified report of the work of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bohart v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Purcell v. ParksIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- United States v. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bynum v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Board of Commissioners v. HarmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shearer v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Breene v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. ErnestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Harper v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gay v. City of GlendaleArizona Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.