Bohart v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
In an action between J. A. Bohart and others and Margaret Anderson a controversy arose between Thomas J. O’Neill, counsel for plaintiffs in error, and W. II. L. Campbell, the clerk of the Supreme Court, as to whether the clerk was entitled to demand his fees for filing papers when offered and on refusal to pay the same decline to render the service. Finding for the clerk.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This matter is a side issue to the above-entitled cause, arising on a controversy between Thomas J. O’Neill, Esq., counsel for plaintiffs in error, and W. H. L. Campbell, Esq., clerk of the Supreme Court, in reference to the payment of fees for the filing of the papers in the cause. When the same was tendered for filing, counsel for plaintiffs in error was called upon by the clerk to make an advanced deposit. On his declining to do so, this requirement was waived by the clerk, as is shown by the correspondence attached to the motion, and movant informed that, if he did not wish to make the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Crawford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Trapp, Auditor v. Wells-Fargo Express Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- United States v. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Alexander v. HarrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Riley v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.