Legal Opinion
People v. Baker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (DiFiore, J.), dated May 7, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant’s contention that the County Court erroneously designated him a level three sex offender because the People failed to prove his mental health status by clear and convincing evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Roland, 292 AD2d 271 [2002]). In any event, the court’s determination was not based…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BottistiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. AngeloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. VenturaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. GliattaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.