Legal Opinion

Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. Federal Contracting Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 27, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In Admiralty. Action to recover hire of dredge.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought by the Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Company against the Federal Contracting Company to recover the hire of Dredge No. 2, under a written contract to pay $3,000 per month, from July 1st to July 24th, 1905, amounting to $2,322.48. The respondent defends, (1) on the ground that the dredge was not able to do the work which it was represented she could do, and (2) because the court has no jurisdiction of the cause of action.

1. It appeal's that the respondent paid the hire of the dredge for the months of April, May and June, 1905, and the testimony did not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Atlee v. Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. The Rock Island BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. The BlackheathSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kibadeaux v. Standard Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  2. Charles Barnes Co. v. One Dredge BoatDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1909
  3. Hoof v. Pacific American FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  4. The PoughkeepsieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1908
  5. George Leary Const. Co. v. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API