Legal Opinion
The Poughkeepsie
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1908PublishedCited by 13 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
This action was brought by the Phoenix-Construction Company against the steamers Poughkeepsie and Homer-Ramsdell to recover damages caused to certain borings, in connection with test holes in the Hudson River, off Storm King, being, made-for the purpose of locating an aqueduct under the river with a view to conveying water accumulated on the west side of said river to the-east side thereof, and thence to the City of New York. The libel' further allege^ that having obtained necessary permission from the Secretary of War of the United States, the libellant commenced work…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad Co. v. Cleveland Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- The BlackheathSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- The TroySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Humbird v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. the John R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. P. Sanford Ross, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1915
- Kohlasch v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha v. Great Western Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.