Legal Opinion

Estate of Corwin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1882No. 6,997PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by George W. Gildersleeve, administrator of the estate of Joseph R Oorwin, from an order ordering him to make a conveyance of certain real estate in the Probate Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Myrick, J. A petition for hearing in bank was filed in this case after judgment, and denied.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an application by petitioner to the Probate- Court of the City and County of San Francisco under Chapter IX *163of the Code of Civil Procedure, which treats “ of the conveyance of real estate by executors and administrators in certain cases,” and the appeal is taken from the order directing the conveyance asked for in the petition.

The order is appealable. (C. C. P., § 969, Subd. 5.) The conveyance there mentioned is not, as contended by respondent, a conveyance on sale and partition. The section referred to, in our opinion, authorizes the appeal.

There is a sufficient undertaking…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Andrada v. KelseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In Re Bank's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Sherman Bros. v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. In Re Estate of BackestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. In Re BillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API