Legal Opinion

Foster v. Knutson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1974No. 43068PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

— The Superior Court, in a non jury trial, awarded judgment in favor of Myron and Earl Foster and Janet Conrad, appellants, for $15,703.35 against Ronald and Jack Knutson and their wives, respondents and cross-appellants.

Appellants claim they are entitled to a deficiency judgment for approximately $115,000 and to foreclose on mortgages given as security after respondents defaulted on a contract to purchase corporate stock. Respondents/cross- appellants claim' damáges for wrongful rescission of the contract and further ask for refund of all sums paid under the contract of purchase.. We reverse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Smith v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. In re the Estate of KiamieNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hemenway v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Levers v. Rio King Land & Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kobuk Engineering & Contracting Services, Inc. v. Superior Tank & Construction Co-Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Leasing Service Corp. v. BroetjeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Shultz v. Delaware Trust CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API