Mark Inn, Inc. v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Condemnees appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in a condemnation proceeding. Held:
1. The condemnor introduced evidence as to value through the testimony of two expert witnesses. No objection was made to their testimony. After the condemnor rested and during the presentation of condemnees’ case, counsel for condemnees made the following motion: “I would like to move the Court first to exclude in its entirety the testimony of [one of condemnor’s expert witnesses] regarding land values, in that at no time did he testify as to what dates those sales occurred. . . .…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Childs v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Blount v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Ray v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Waters v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Brantley v. HellerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fontaine v. PeitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- John D. Robinson Corp. v. Southern Marine & Industrial Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Tharp v. VESTA HOLDINGS I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Robinson v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Armstrong v. VallionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.