Legal Opinion

Fannon v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2008No. S-12576, S-12596PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Nola Bragg and Link Fannon, residents of the Matanuska-Susitua Borough, appeal the superior court's order upholding the legality of the Borough's tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products. They argue (1) that under AS 29.35.170, the Borough lacks authority to levy an excise tax or any other type of duty apart from "property, sales, and use taxes"; and (2) that to the extent that the Borough's tobacco tax falls within the multistate tax compact's definition of "sales tax," 1 it cannot remain in force without voter ratification. The Borough…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Friends of Willow Lake, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, Division of Aviation & AirportsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API