Legal Opinion
Sipco Services & Marine Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 1994No. 92-604CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This matter is before the court on defendant’s January 15, 1993, Motion for Partial Dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Plaintiff, Sipco Services & Marine, Inc. (Sipco), seeks money damages allegedly arising from a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In its complaint Sipco asserts three counts. In its motion defendant asks the court to dismiss Count II because the claim was not properly certified, and Count III because the contracting officer never issued a final…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- The Sharman Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Richard L. Thoen v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cincinnati Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Buse Timber & Sales, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.